The rise of the cool office

  • Publish On 2 January 2017
  • Stream Lab

The office includes both a piece of furniture and space dedicated to work, it is also defined in opposition to the private sphere of housing, it opens as social and cultural scene. Many businesses in the new digital economy to communicate their workspaces. The atmosphere that emerges is an open place, where everyone is free, cool and fun. Cool Office of the trend allows companies to retain employees and ensure the best conditions and beyond the workspace, to convey an image of benevolent enterprise.

The Stream Lab is PCA-STREAM’s research and development laboratory, editor of the book-magazine Stream.

Contemporary office design is on the forefront of change. The twenty-first century company is looking for new forms of collaboration through the design of their spaces, which subsequently reflects their image. With economic factors in flux, being creative with business strategies is paramount. The new office is a result of the change in demographic of the business sector –companies like Google, Facebook, and Apple have young CEO’s and employees that are creating a more liberal and flourishing environment. This form of management is being used as a template for their predecessors and contemporaries because of their youth and success. The design of their websites and applications has surpassed the ethereal and reached the architectural transformation of design and management, where quotidian presents itself in the form of the office and the visible and invisible coexist. This is called The Cool Office.

Discipline and work

From the times when Louis Sullivan and Frank Lloyd Wright were implementing standard floor plans and furniture, the office exercised synchronization in the form of discipline and punishment; it was never regarded as cool – a place you anticipate coming to everyday. The early twentieth century featured theories that separate home and office while infrastructure links the two. In 1958, Herman Miller hired Robert Propst to design office furniture for the new era, where the formula for the everyday commute metamorphosed into home, office, homewww.hermanmiller.com. The cubicle and Action Office layout were created and institutionalized by Propst who believed that his design would change office ambiance and motivate collaboration. To his dismay, the cubicle was repudiated and Propst was faced with the fact that it was one of the worst inventions to come to offices – alienating and isolating employees and causing prison-like cells around offices worldwide.

The Taylorist notion of office design no longer applies to contemporary work ethicsTaylorism implies a theory of management that analyzes workflow processes adopted by Frederick Winslow Taylor.. Frederick Winslow Taylor believed that «… only through enforced standardization of methods, enforced adoption of the best implements and working conditions, and enforced cooperation that faster work can be assured. And the duty of enforcing the adoption of standards and enforcing this cooperation rests with management alone»Taylor, Frederick Winslow. The Principles of Scientific Management. New York: Harper, 1911.. Rows of desks, a suit and tie, and working quietly in the shadow of your supervisor are things of the past.

In 1975, Michel Foucault unveiled Surveiller et Punir, retrospectively presenting the way offices were being run from the twentieth century to the 1990’s obsession with transforming the cubicleFoucault, Michel. Surveiller et Punir: naissance de la prison. Paris: Gallimard, 1994.. Foucault used Jeremy Bentham’s panoptical design for prisons to describe the hunger for power that arose in modernity. The Panopticon was implemented in theory to the traditional office buildingOp. Cit. note (4). One person surveys the rest, similar to the boss sitting in his office looking down over repeated rows of diligently working employees.

Apple has revisited Foucault’s notion of power for their proposed headquarters in the suburbs of Cupertino, California. The building consists of 2.8 million square feet of office, research, and development buildings for roughly 13,000 employees. The program includes an auditorium, fitness center, research facilities, a central plant, and parking to accommodate the employees. Apple’s mega-plex might be a step backward, and slightly akin to the Panopticon, but it cannot be judged until completion in 2015. Prior to this, there are examples of free spirited work environments that ditch the formal relationship between boss and employee. Until the late twentieth century it was rare to see the boss integrate with the rest of the office. From 1943 to 1988 in California, Ray and Charles Eames created a laboratory for writing books, working on furniture design, museum exhibitions, making films, and creating toyswww.eamesoffice.com. They believed creativity and liberalism could be shown in the way you interact with the office, and they were fully committed to an equal level of collaboration. IDEO, an innovative product design firm, used a similar layout for their studio. In 1999, ABC documented the company redesigning a shopping cart. We were able to travel with them through the design process: from the initial product hand off, to the execution of mock-ups, and finally the test try of the winning shopping cartwww.ideo.com/work/shopping-cart-concept. The video displayed that identifying a boss does nothing for the design process. One person cannot be successful alone.

Eames Office, Los Angeles, 1950

From the office to the city

Frank Gehry designed the first virtual office for TBWA/Chiat/Day in Los Angeles. An employee would come in to work, check out a laptop, and find an empty place to sitChang, Jade. «Behind the Glass Curtain.» Metropolis Magazine. 19 June 2006.. This did not work for the folks at TBWA/Chiat/Day. In 2011, another progressive company took over this office. The firm Clive Wilkinson Architects redesigned the space within Gehry’s original design to create a playground for Google’s engineers. From the beginning, Google co-founders Sergey Brin and Larry Page initiated a different management techniqueGirard, Bernard. The Google Way: How One Company is Revolutionize Management as We Know It. San Francisco, CA: No Starch Pr., 2009.. This is represented in the Googleplex. It is not just an office building; it is a complex with all the components that will keep the engineers willing and eager to stay at the office day and night. Furthermore, it is a clear representation of the tangible architectural elements that the client can be apart of, as well as the intangible notion of trust that is ever-present but not necessarily seen.

The headquarters for Facebook, the world’s largest social networking website, practices the same belief in blurring the lines between work and play. Studio O + A color-coded the walls to differentiate team rooms while some walls are unfinished so employees can draw, write, and sketch on them. More importantly, they used a Facebook page to talk about the design of their new office while the building process was happening. It is a full-on collaboration not just for their «job» but also for the way they live and interact within their home away from home.

Through this sense of freedom brought on by new management techniques, a form of office fetishism has surfaced. Some examples are the Post-It wars, Converse trends, bicycles at the desk, and Casual Friday’s. Though they seem to be a frivolous waste of time to traditional businesses, to some they are seen as valuable teambuilding exercises – although they cost time and money, they benefit everyone in the end.

In Montreuil, France, the War of the Post-Its began in Summer 2011, giving us an example of inadvertent collaboration. Employees covered their windows with Post-Its reflecting figures of pixilated iconic imagery. Idle workers at Ubisoft created the aliens from Space Invaders, thus initiating a response from BNP Paribas bankers across the street«POST-IT – Les Open-space parisiens se déclarent la guerre.» Le Monde. 01 August 2011.. Perhaps this started as a way to avoid work, but it manifested into a tell-tale way for co-workers to interact through a series of steps: first, come up with an idea for an image; second, graph it with the appropriate size of post-its, color palette, etc.; and finally, execute these ideas that sometimes stretch the entire façade of a building.

Innovation and domesticity

When Bill Gates started Microsoft, one of the first things he did was take off his tieConsidine, Austin. «On the Web, Every Day is Casual Friday.» The New York Times. 18 March 2011.. This sparked the infamous fashion statement business casual and declared the demise of power-knowledgeFrom Foucault Surveiller et Punir: Naissance de la prison. Foucault believed that power and knowledge were fundamentally connected. He often combined them in a single hyphenated concept, power-knowledge.. Rather than being formal and uncomfortable at work, Gates allowed for flexibility within the office. Casual dress eased into corporate America during the dot-com boom and later reached other countries. One day a week employees can leave their formal work attire at home and dress down to the office. This is known as Casual Friday. Some companies that have a more relaxed dress code celebrate Formal Friday. The Casual Friday faux pas also exists–since the casual day is often on Fridays, it gives the feeling that the weekend has arrived and brings inappropriate attire to the office.

An image of the Facebook headquarters reveals an aesthetic for the contemporary office. Employees fraternizing during work hours while resting on a desk; bicycles leaning against walls giving peace of mind to the owners who need not worry for thieves; the letters h-a-c-k hanging from the ceiling that holds a motivation for employees. The Eames’ rocking chairs are next to a coffee table accompanying a blue sofa similar to a family room. A large rug covering the ground adds a familiarity to the open space, with colorful walls, and plants disbursed throughout the office. What is not present in this image is a manager telling them to get back to work – because they are working, at their own pace, in their own clothes, surrounded by their own things.

Facebook Headquarters, Palo Alto  © Cesar Rubio and Studio O+A

Like the proverbial house drawn with a pitched roof and smoking chimney glorified by Robert Venturi, we could do the same with the office – take a crayon to paper and you would have floor upon floor, repeated with people sitting at desks, in anticipation to break out of the building and be on their way home. So what is the intention behind the new form of office design that is straying away from our familiar iconic view of the office?

Hundreds of How To books about office design have been published. The question is not how to design the office. It begins with in-house redesign and reinvention. If management believes in traditional hierarchical sectors, then adding a bike and a splash of color to a wall will not make a cool office. The key to becoming a cool office lies in knowing how to make your employees comfortable while being at their most efficient. Ornamentation is not a means to a solution. The twenty-first century company is showing that the formula is not to distribute tasks, finish that task then move on to the next ad infinitum; going from A to B should be customized by the employee. What happens from the moment you receive the task to when you have finished it is completely up to you. In 2010, Architizer.com held a competition for the World’s Coolest Office where they gathered the coolest working office designs«The Worlds Coolest Office.» www.architizer.com. This is a symptom of misunderstanding the role of aesthetics, which cannot be used as a strategy for core office transformation – the design solution begins with the unseen.

Google’s corporate code of conduct begins: “Don’t be Evil”. Google says this is “to protect our users from malicious access to information, to understand their needs, and to give them the best possible products and services. But it also means, more generally, doing things with probity – not breaking the law, acting honorably, and respecting everyone“Code of Conduct.”, Google Investor Relations, December 2, 2011.”. This is why we believe that Google, which has access to our email, our daily searches, our friends, our family, our location, which has satellite views of our home or workplace, knows our personal conversations by phone, Google Talk, Google Video, etc., sees everything and knows everything about us. – which sees everything and knows everything about us, won’t use any of this against us. The image we have of Google, despite this incredible accumulation of information, doesn’t scare us. They’re cool, they play ping-pong, they wear flip-flops to work. We can only trust them. Google has proved that image is everything, and the way the office is laid out reflects that image. This is where the visible and the invisible meet.

Steve Wozniak and Steve Jobs founded Apple in Jobs’ parents’ garage; Mark Zuckerberg co-founded Facebook in his Harvard dorm room; Larry Page and Sergey Brin developed Google while studying at Stanford University.
It’s reassuring to think that all these creations took place in a serene, informal environment, almost the antithesis of the working world.The inventors of this modern phenomenon, the creators of nouns that we use as verbs at least several times a day, have transformed the way we use the Internet, the way we relate to others, and are now transforming the way we design our offices, when all they wanted to do was re-create the original place where they made their discoveries.

Pooneh Erami under the direction of Aurélien Gillier

(This article was published in Stream 02 in 2012.)

Bibliography

explore

Article

The « office-form »

Clément Dirié

Article

The « office-form »

Representing workspace, this figure shows real space and mental space simultaneously; a cerebral organization and its material translation. From the Renaissance to the 21st century, from the aesthetic documentation to ambiguous utopia, the following images are some incarnations of the «office-form.» Clément Dirié is an art historian and art critic, curator and editor specialized in contemporary art.

Discover
Article
Article

The tall office building artistically considered

Written in 1896 by Louis Sullivan, the founder of the Chicago School, of which reputable phrases were invented such as « form follows function », this text analyzes the characteristics of a new urban form for the city of the nineteenth century. Sullivan questions the role of the architect within these architectural standards – vertical and repetitive office buildings, the birth of the Fordist production-materialization model in urban space. Louis H. Sullivan is an American architect (1856‒1924), who has been called the father of skyscrapers.

Discover
Article
Article

Is the office the new studio? Some artistic experiences in open space

Some selected cases of artist residencies in business draws a panorama of the possibilities of an immersion of the arts into the world of economy. If one wonders about the profusion of these experiences, just think that art has continued to push its boundaries. The canvas on the wall, of virtual realities and of open spaces. While providing a new space for a creation that echoes the economic sphere, these residences are rich in knowledge for understanding today’s business. The information they generate are made of flesh and not numbers. Clément Dirié is an art historian and art critic, curator and editor specialized in contemporary art.

Discover